Thursday, March 22, 2018

5 Life Lessons From Stephen Hawking

Stephen Hawking

As the passing of renowned physicist and public intellectual Stephen Hawking is met with grief and remembrance the world over, Next Avenue wanted to honor the man who educated the world on a host of issues by sharing five important lessons we learned from him:

1. Trust in science, but remember that we haven’t uncovered all its mysteries yet.

At 22, Professor Hawking was diagnosed with a rare form of motor neuron disease and told he only had a few years to live. For most of his adult life, he was wheelchair bound and could speak only with the aid of a vocal synthesizer. Yet, against all odds, Hawking had a successful career and rich family life until passing away at the age of 76.

2. Sometimes a person’s greatest impact happens when he or she feels (literally) voiceless.

From Oxford graduate to public figure to cosmologist to celebrity, Stephen Hawking was perhaps the scientist with the most prominent place in the public eye in the past few decades. His book, A Brief History of Time, shattered expectations for sales. And in recent years, he was a vocal critic of environmental policies that he felt were hurting the planet. He traveled to space, figuratively, and had a “theory of everything.” In short, Hawking hasn’t spoken without the aid of a computer for decades, but he has most definitely been heard.

3. The universe is vast, and our own potential is just as limitless.

Professor Hawking had as much to say about humanity as he did about the cosmos. In a 1998 interview with Der Spiegiel he said “We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star. But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special.” He also had great wisdom about our responsibilities to ourselves and one another as people. In a 2010 interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC, Hawking offered three pieces of wise advice: “One, remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Two, never give up work. Work gives you meaning and purpose and life is empty without it. Three, if you are lucky enough to find love, remember it is there and don’t throw it away.”

4. Live in the moment and remember what (and who) truly matters.

Despite having his mind and gaze directed at the stars, Hawking was always present in the life, family and community that surrounded him. Indeed, his children have credited him as being a loving father, noting that he would often say, “It would not be much of a universe if it wasn’t home to the people you love.” Click here to continue reading.

The Top Drugs for Older Adults to Avoid

drug side effects

You fill a prescription, a medication you’ve relied on before. A few days later, you experience a troubling side effect. You read online that no one your age should take this medication.
What happened?

Drug Side Effects and Older Adults

Two pharmacists say the aging process is to blame, and they reveal here the names of medications on their “black list” that older adults may want to avoid.
“Prescribing medications for people 65 and older can be more challenging, because some drugs can be more toxic or cause more side effects than when you were younger,” says Kirby Lee, a pharmacist and associate professor of clinical pharmacy at the University of California at San Francisco. “As your body ages, it absorbs medications differently. They can be metabolized differently by your liver and excreted differently by your kidneys, so you may be more sensitive to some medications.” Click here to continue reading.

Thursday, March 15, 2018

Movie Review—The Post

The Post (film).png
Theatrical release poster

by Peter J. O’Connell   

The Post. Released: Dec. 2017. Runtime: 116 mins. MPAA Rating: PG-13 for language and brief war violence.

Print journalism is an embattled phenomenon today. Digital devices and controversies about bias and “fake news” have taken away much of the readership and advertising that newspapers used to have. Two recent films, however, have reminded us if the vital role that a newspaper can play.

Spotlight, the 2015 Oscar winner, depicted how the Boston Globe at the turn of this century exposed the cover-up of child sexual abuse by the Catholic clergy. Now, The Post, one of the Oscars nominees for 2017, shows how in 1971 the country’s first female publisher of a major newspaper and a hard-driving editor entered an unprecedented battle between the press and the government to uncover deceptions about the Vietnam War.

This story of The Washington Post’s role in the Pentagon Papers affair is directed by Steven Spielberg and was written by Liz Hannah and Josh Singer. A 20th Century Fox film, it begins by showing the company’s logo but not its usual fanfare. Instead, we hear sound effects of action in Vietnam, which leads into the movie’s first scene.

In that scene, set in late 1965, Daniel Ellsberg (Matthew Rhys), a military analyst for the State Department, observes things going badly for U.S. troops. On a flight home, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (Bruce Greenwood) agrees with Ellsberg’s view that the war in Vietnam is hopeless. Yet upon landing in the U.S., McNamara buoyantly expresses an optimistic attitude about the war effort to the press and public.

Experiencing increasing disgust at this kind of mendacity, in 1971, Ellsberg, now working for a civilian military contractor, the RAND Corporation, secretly photocopies a trove of classified reports from the 1945-1967 period that document the policymaking process with regard to Vietnam and the progress—actually, lack of same—of the war there. He then leaks these documents, which come to be known as the Pentagon Papers, to The New York Times.

In the meantime, heiress Katharine Graham (Meryl Streep) has become owner and publisher of The Washington Post, following the deaths of her father and her husband. A wife, mother, and socialite for most of her life rather than a business executive, Graham finds running a major newspaper a difficult challenge, particularly in view of the prevailing sexism of the period. The movie indicates this aspect of the period well by having Graham as the only woman in a room full of men in dark suits and white shirts—or even waiting outside the room—or chatting after dinner about light matters with women while in a another room men discuss weightier topics. Things are particularly difficult for Graham in 1971 as the Post is about to become a publicly traded corporation rather than a privately held one. This pending deal is a delicate one that could be derailed if controversies or legal hassles engulf the paper.  

One of the men who sometimes “overrules” Graham is the paper’s assertive editor-in-chief, Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks). Bradlee is extremely desirous of catching up with The New York Times in terms of getting the “big stories.” Ellsberg has given the Times the big story of the Pentagon Papers, but when the Times begins to publish that story, a court injunction obtained by the Nixon administration halts the series.

At this point the movie takes on aspects of a thriller as Bradlee activates Ben Bagdikian (Bob Odenkirk), an assistant editor, to track down the source of the Pentagon Papers and obtain copies. Bagdikian succeeds in this assignment, and Post editors and reporters find themselves, in a somewhat humorous scene, on the floor trying to put together thousands of pages (page numbers have been cut off) in the proper order for possible publication, while making sure that no genuinely current national security material will be revealed.

Whether there will be publication or not depends on Graham’s yes or no. If legal action by the Nixon administration after publication should be successful, the Post could be badly harmed at a crucial juncture. But if the newspaper should prevail in a legal challenge, it would become a national institution, not just a Washington one. Lawyers advise against publication. Bradlee is for publication but knows that the difficult decision is Graham’s alone to make.

And she does. And it’s “yes.” That always exciting moment in movies about newspapers when the presses run and the paper hits the streets is particularly well done in The Post. The White House immediately strikes back. The Times and the Post are soon before the Supreme Court arguing for their First Amendment rights to publish the Pentagon Papers. As the case is argued, newspapers throughout the country publish the formerly secret documents. The Court rules for the press. Nixon then orders that the Post be banned from the White House.

And in a flash-forward to 1972, a security guard discovers a break-in in progress at Democratic Party offices in the Watergate complex. Thus, The Post ends as a kind of prequel to the classic movie about the value of newspapers, All the President’s Men (1976), which dealt with how Washington Post reporters did much to uncover the scandals that led to President Nixon’s resignation.

Steven Spielberg’s direction of the film is economical and “to the point,” nicely weaving together the political and legal themes with the woman’s empowerment theme, and the world-historical aspects with lighter ones. And he lets his stars do what Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks always have done so well—create convincing characters , whether based on actual persons or not. Hanks may not have quite that “certain something” that Jason Robards as Bradlee had in All the President’s Men, but he’s very good. Streep’s Kay Graham, like her Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady (2011) or the title character in Florence Foster Jenkins (2016), is a “grande dame” type but with a likeable as well as “grande” side. She has “spunk” as well as aplomb. (And she was sometimes called the “Iron Lady” by her colleagues.)

All in all, The Post is an effective reminder of the truth declared in the majority Supreme Court opinion in the Pentagon Papers case: “In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.”


“Footnotes” to the film: (1) The Post may give The Washington Post a bit too much credit and The New York Times not enough. It was, after all, the Times that began publication of the Pentagon Papers and was the sole winner of the Pulitzer Prize for doing so. Also, The Post may give the Nixon administration too much discredit. The Pentagon Papers dealt mostly with the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, and not at all with the Nixon administration. There is no reason to believe that the Nixon administration in its response to publication of the Pentagon Papers was not acting out of sincere beliefs regarding national security. (2) Spotlight was written by Josh Singer, co-screenwriter of The Post. Ben Bradlee’s son was a reporter on the Boston Globe and is depicted in Spotlight. (3) Steven Spielberg developed The Post with great alacrity. Shooting and final cutting was done May-July of 2017, and the film was released at the end of the year.       


  

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Movie Review—I, Tonya

I, Tonya
I, Tonya.png
Theatrical release poster

by Peter J. O’Connell

I, Tonya. Released: Dec. 2017. Runtime: 120 mins. MPAA Rating: R for pervasive language, violence, and some sexual content/nudity.

Mothers were memorable figures in a number of movies over the past year. For example, there was the title character played by Jennifer Lawrence in Darren Aronofsky’s odd allegory, Mother! And there was the agnostic mother (Julianne Nicholson) and the Reverend Mother (Melissa Leo, who contended for the heart and mind of a young nun in Novitiate. And there was the mom (Laurie Metcalf)—both hassled and hassling--in Lady Bird. Perhaps most memorable of all was LaVona Fay Golden (Allison Janney), merciless mater of figure skater Tonya Harding (Margot Robbie), in the tragicomic biopic I, Tonya, directed by Craig Gillespie and written by Steven Rogers.

I, Tonya’s chronicle of the relationship between Tonya and her mother—and other key figures in the skater’s life—is done in a kind of “mockumentary” way, based, as an on-screen text says, on “mostly true, wildly contradictory” actual interviews. Though some actual footage is included in the film, most of the interviews are “faux” ones. There are also direct addresses by characters that “break the fourth wall” of the unfolding drama. The Tonya character sums up one of the story’s themes as: “There’s no such thing as truth. It’s bull. Everyone has their own truth, and life does whatever it wants. “

But for much of her life, Tonya has to do what her mother wants. Noting Tonya’s natural ability at skating, LaVona arranges for her daughter (played as a child by Maizie Smith and McKenna Grace) to begin expensive skating lessons at the age of four years. This was a sacrifice for LaVona, a waitress, to make. Her family, a Pacific Northwest equivalent of “rednecks,” was financially constrained.

This initial sacrifice, however, proves quite problematic, and most of the time LaVona—a cigarillo-chomping, fiercely foul-mouthed harridan, often with a bird, and always with a “chip,” on her shoulder—verbally and emotionally abuses Tonya. Sometimes the abuse is physical. Joan Crawford, played by Faye Dunaway in Mommy Dearest (1981), notoriously beat her daughter with metal coat hangers, but LaVona throws knives at hers.

Strangely, although she arranged for skating lessons, LaVona undercuts Tonya’s self-esteem when she competes, and she doesn’t help her child with costuming, musical choices, etc. In one of the pungent passages with which the script is replete, the mother/daughter dynamic is summed up thusly: LaVona—“I made you a champion, knowing you’d hate me for it. That’s the sacrifice a mother makes! I wish I’d had a mother like me instead of nice. Nice gets you s---! I didn’t like my mother either, so what? I f------ gave you a gift!” Tonya—“You cursed me.”

Tonya does get love and respect from her father (Jason Davis), but he eventually divorces LaVona and leaves the family. Predictably, Tonya as an adolescent turns to a boyfriend, Jeff Gillooly (Sebastian Stan), as a daddy substitute. Predictably, Jeff starts abusing her, even after they marry, much as her mother had.
The skating establishment of the 1980s and early 1990s, in its way, also abuses Tonya. They prefer balletic princess-types rather than an athletic type such as the sassy Tonya (who can be as foul-mouthed as her mother). But Tonya perseveres, and when she becomes only the second woman ever to perform the incredibly difficult triple-axel jump in international competition, respect finally comes her way. At that moment, as the best figure skater in the world, she is a glowing champion!

But as recognition comes Tonya Harding’s way, so does scandal, one of the most notorious scandals in sports history. As the 1994 Winter Olympics approach, Tonya has Nancy Kerrigan as her main competition. Much loose talk and little intelligent thought characterize Tonya’s circle of Jeff, Shawn Eckhardt (Paul Walker Hauser), and some other dimbulbs. Under circumstances whose nature is contested in “wildly contradictory” stories by those involved, Kerrigan is brutally struck on the knee in an attempt to disable her from competition. But she recovers and beats Tonya at the Games. Jeff, Shawn, and Tonya are convicted of various crimes, and Tonya is banned from competitive figure skating for life.

Tonya reflects on her life and the larger scene, the American scene, of which her life is a part: “America. They want someone to love; they want someone to hate.” And: “I was loved for a minute; then I was hated. Then I was just a punch line.” And, addressing the movie audience: “It was like being abused all over again. Only this time it was by you. All of you. You’re all my attackers too.”

There are characters in I, Tonya who are dimbulbs, but the movie’s makers and cast perform brilliantly. Gillespie and Rogers have given the film an imaginative and innovative structure, with dialogue frequently as sharp as a skate blade. Margot Robbie leaves her blonde bimbo persona from previous films behind to create a multidimensional Tonya—abuse victim, glowing champion, tough broad. Her performance is the acting equivalent of a triple axel, which is matched by Allison Janney as a “mommy damnedest.”


“Footnotes” to the film: (1) Through her youth and adolescence, Allison Janney trained seriously to become a figure skater. At age 17, however, she accidentally walked into a glass door and gravely injured her right leg. She had to spend weeks in the hospital and missed her first year of college. After that she didn’t skate for a very long time. (2) In 1993 I, Tonya’s director, Craig Gillespie, directed a Campbell’s Soup commercial starring Nancy Kerrigan. 


       

76-Year-Old Blogger Navigates Aging With Cancer

Pancreatic Cancer

“It’s a shadow chasing behind you constantly,” says popular Time Goes By blogger Ronni Bennett. Her site’s tagline is “What it’s really like to get old,” but Bennett, 76, is now writing about more than aging. Eight months ago, she was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
After posting the news that she referred to as a “kick in the gut,” it triggered a virtual international support system from readers of love, prayers and assurances. Those living close by also offered food, transportation and even pet-sitting for Bennett’s cat, Ollie.
As we grow older, we most likely will become familiar with cancer, whether it’s with family, friends or ourselves. In fact, its diagnosis isn’t all that uncommon. Age is actually the greatest risk factor, according to Cancer.net, and 60 percent of those with cancer are 65 years and older. This group also makes up 60 percent of survivors.
When readers asked Bennett if she’d write about the daily life of a cancer patient, she said yes, allowing now a glimpse into not just what it’s like to get old, but to also be really sick. She openly talks about good days and bad, where she stands on having a bucket list and what it’s like to be the most afraid she’s ever been.
Here are a few thoughts Bennett, a former network TV producer and writer and managing editor of the first CBS News website, shared during an interview in December: Click here to continue reading.

Age With Grace – Tips for a Better Life--Meriden Library

overthehill

Dr. Keith Zeitlin, a certified Naturopathic Physician, presents an informative and entertaining exploration of the aging process.
Dr. Zeitlin discusses important everyday activities for our health. How life style and 

Tuesday, March 6 at 6:00

Dr. Keith Zeitlin, a certified Naturopathic Physician, presents an informative and entertaining exploration of the aging process.
Dr. Zeitlin discusses important everyday activities for our health. How life style and using natural treatments prevents premature tissue damage. You will leave with valuable tools for personal improvement inside and out.
To register, Call 203-630-6349

Movie Review—Lady Bird

Lady Bird poster.jpeg
Theatrical release poster

by Peter J. O’Connell

Ladybird. Released: Dec. 2017. Runtime: 94 mins. MPAA Rating: R for language, sexual content, brief graphic nudity, and teen partying.

Christine McPherson (Saoirse Ronan) decides to start calling herself “Lady Bird.” Presumably, it’s because she remembers the “fly away” phrase from the nursery rhyme. Christine definitely wants to fly away. She is a 17-year-old student at Immaculate Heart, a Catholic girls’ school in Sacramento, in 2002, who desperately wants to go to college in New York City, “where the culture is” (or “at least Connecticut”).  

However, Christine’s mother, Marion (Laurie Metcalf), wants her daughter to go to college nearby so as to save money. Christine’s efforts to “take flight” over the course of her senior year in high school, and the consequent clashes with her mother, are depicted in Lady Bird, a piquant/poignant coming-of-age “dramedy,” meticulously written and directed by Greta Gerwig.

Lady Bird’s efforts at flight begin inauspiciously and go on from there. Taken on a tour of California colleges by her mother, the girl’s persistent interest in going to New York leads to an argument with Marion while the two are in a car. Impulsively, Lady Bird throws herself from the car, injuring her wing . . . arm.

Lady Bird’s family lives on the “wrong side of the tracks.” In the Sacramento context, that means a modest house—“one bathroom for five people”—in a pleasant neighborhood. The three other people besides Laurie and Lady Bird are Lady Bird’s father (Tracy Letts), her adopted brother (Jordan Rodrigues), and Jordan’s girlfriend (Marielle Scott). Lady Bird’s father suffers from depression and his hold on a job is shaky. Marion, who works two shifts, is the one really holding the family together. And she’s starting to feel the strain.

As Lady Bird’s senior year unfolds, her “wing” (arm) gradually heals, and she undergoes various ups and downs in her efforts to fly away from Sacramento and her strong but strained mother. Lady Bird says that she knows that Marion “loves her,” but she wonders if her mother actually “likes her.” Marion tells Lady Bird that she always has encouraged her daughter to be the best version of Christine that Christine can be. Lady Bird worries that “what is” is already the best that she ever could be.

“What is” is a pale, lanky, gangly, stringy-haired, long-faced, skinny-legged adolescent in a dorky uniform—who occasionally shows flashes of idiosyncratic beauty. “What is” is an underachieving young woman of great potential. Saoirse Ronan’s performance as Lady Bird is so good that one might say that it is the best that could conceivably have been done in this role. That might also almost be said of Laurie Metcalf in the role of Marion.

Though Lady Bird refers to her school as “Immaculate Fart” rather than Immaculate Heart, she doesn’t really dislike it. Unlike many Hollywood depictions in recent years of religious people and institutions as rigid and repressive, Gerwig—a director with a marvelously balanced approach to characters and situations—presents this parochial school as staffed by caring and competent, though sometimes slightly goofy, folks. Lois Smith as Sister Sarah Joan, the assistant principal, is a particularly endearing figure. After Lady Bird and a friend pull a prank on her by putting a sign “Just Married to Jesus” on her car, Sister gently chides Lady Bird by saying, “Actually, married for 40 years.” Lady Bird replies, “He was a lucky guy.”

As her senior year goes on, Lady Bird has an in-and-out relationship with a school play, an off-again/on-again (and vice versa) relationship with two different kinds of girl friends (Odeya Rush, Beanie Feldstein—topnotch), an on-again/off-again (and vice versa) relationship with two different kinds of boyfriends (Lucas Hedges, Timothee Chalamet), encounters with drugs and drink—all presented as simultaneously serious (but not somber) and amusing (but not farcical). Drily witty dialogue ripples throughout the film without calling undue attention to itself.


Eventually, of course, Lady Bird has to come to terms with both her college situation and her relationship with her mother. Does she come to realize that in the nursery rhyme, the “ladybird” is not a child but a mother who flies to see if her children are safe when their house is burning? Take a flight yourself to a theatre to see this wonderful film and find out!